EU CRA ComplianceA Malkan Solutions company
Product classifier See the CRA Workbench →Workbench →

Product classifierOT / ICSRegulation (EU) 2024/2847

Is my OT product important or critical under the CRA?

Fifteen industrial product types classified against Annex III and IV — with the Official Journal text behind each answer.

01
The rule

One test decides it: core functionality

Almost every networked OT product is in scope. The question that matters is which class — because class decides whether you can self-assess or need a notified body.

“Products with digital elements which have the core functionality of a product category set out in Annex III shall be considered to be important products with digital elements and shall be subject to the conformity assessment procedures referred to in Article 32(2) and (3).”

— Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Article 7(1)

Two consequences trip up industrial manufacturers. First, integrating a listed component — an RTOS, a network interface, a VPN client — does not by itself make your controller or drive an important product:

“The integration of a product with digital elements which has the core functionality of a product category set out in Annex III shall not in itself render the product in which it is integrated subject to the conformity assessment procedures referred to in Article 32(2) and (3).”

— Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Article 7(1)

Second, the reverse also holds. A product that can perform a listed function but whose core function is different is not in that category:

“a product with digital elements that has the ability to perform the functions of a product category set out in Annexes III and IV to Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 but whose core functionality itself is different from that of such product category is not to be considered to meet the technical description of that product category.”

— Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392, recital 5

Source: Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Article 7(1); Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392, recital 5.

02
By product

OT product types, classified

Default — Not in Annex III or IV

Self-assessment is available: internal control (Module A, Annex VIII) under Article 32(1). No notified body is needed, but the full Annex I evidence and the Annex VII technical file still are.

Important — Class I — Annex III, Class I

Module A is only available if you apply harmonised standards, common specifications or a European cybersecurity certification scheme (assurance level at least ‘substantial’) in full. Otherwise a notified body is involved: EU-type examination (Module B + C) or full quality assurance (Module H) — Article 32(2).

Important — Class II — Annex III, Class II

Third-party assessment is required: Module B + C, Module H, or a European cybersecurity certification scheme at assurance level at least ‘substantial’ where available — Article 32(3). Self-assessment is not an option.

Critical — Annex IV

A European cybersecurity certificate where a delegated act under Article 8(1) requires one; where it does not, the Class II procedures apply — Article 32(4).

Source: Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Annexes III–IV and Article 32; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392, Annexes I–II.

Classification is step one of six.

The CRA Workbench records your core-functionality reasoning the way an assessor will read it, then carries it through risk, Annex I, conformity route, vulnerability handling and the Annex VII file — with the IEC 62443 bridge built in.

See the CRA Workbench →

This page is general information about Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392, not legal advice. Quoted text is from the Official Journal; the analysis around it is ours. Classification turns on your product’s actual core functionality — document your own determination and confirm it against the current official texts. The CRA Workbench produces draft documentation for expert review; it indicates the evidence needed and does not, by itself, guarantee compliance.